Assignment #1
Discuss the components of an effective writing
program and why they are important.
The three components
discussed are personal connections, writing conventions, and inventions. Personal connections are important because it
is important to bring the lives of the students into the classroom. It is imperative for them to personally
connect. One type of writing that fosters this is personal narratives. It is
also important to give them a choice in regards to the literature they write
about or connect to such as ‘kid-culture’ text.
The next component is writing conventions- especially at the discourse/text
level. Teachers need to make sure that
conventions are addressed to each individual’s needs rather than to only to the
whole class. It becomes more meaningful
for each student when approached this way.
It is advised not to work on more than two conventions at a time- so as
to not overwhelm the students. The last
component is inventions. There is room
for students’ original ideas and choice.
Experimenting with formats give
students a chance to invent.
Giving students more choices during
quick-write time or even during “in-between” time can create more time for
students to write in general and about personal experiences. Although it wasn’t officially writing time
during class, the students were given the freedom to work on their personal
narratives whenever they chose.
Assignment #2
What factors support student growth in
writing? Giving students different opportunities to write, support student growth in writing. Writing to children, with children, and by children promotes growth.
Consider the opportunities you provide for student discussion before writing.
How
could you increase those opportunities? What kinds of writing exercises lend
themselves to discussion?
The more they talk, the more students express
themselves. I think opinion and persuasive writing lend themselves to
discussion. When students can make a
personal connection to a topic or text, then there is more opportunity for them
to express opinions orally. This can
then transfer to writing opportunities as well.
Improves the level of their performance. Collaborative text-talks can foster and
promote students’ writing skills.
Students can reflect and interact with each other based on text and then
transfer those thoughts through writing.
There are some benefits of the assessment strategies Professor Ruiz proposes. Weaknesses and strengths of the writing skills of each student can be established through assessment. By using this data, goals can then be established. Students help to construct a portfolio of their “ongoing work”. Teachers can discover through assessment- what subject matter students are more comfortable with.
There have been writing assessments that
demonstrate the students’ understanding of the content area subjects such as
social studies and science. I’ve
experienced administering these assessments previously and realize how important
reading and writing in the content areas is for literacy development. The assessments I see the most are extended
and constructed responses after reading an informational, narrative or
persuasive writing piece. Therefore students need as much exposure and practice
with these forms as possible.
As Professor Ruiz stated, formal assessments can be
a means of preparation for “high-stakes assessment”. The challenges of incorporating formal
assessments into my curriculum could be as I previously stated: time
constraints or even inadequate staff.
Staff is needed to not only administer these assessments but also
evaluate them. This must all be done
without disrupting the flow of the curriculum.
I would address this by possibly participating in collaborative inquiry
with a fellow teacher as a means of support.
No comments:
Post a Comment